Electoral Incentives and Budgetary Spending: Rethinking the Role of Political Institutions
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 70, Heft 4, S. 1086-1097
ISSN: 1468-2508
14 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 70, Heft 4, S. 1086-1097
ISSN: 1468-2508
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 70, Heft 4, S. 1086-1097
ISSN: 0022-3816
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 67, Heft 3, S. 716-730
ISSN: 0022-3816
In: Government & opposition: an international journal of comparative politics, Band 58, Heft 1, S. 106-128
ISSN: 1477-7053
AbstractThis article develops a theory to account for the variation in electoral systems in electoral authoritarian regimes. We argue that resource-rich dictators are incentivized to employ proportional representation systems to alleviate the threat from the masses and pre-empt the emergence of new opposition, while resource-poor dictators tend to choose majoritarian systems to co-opt ruling elites in the legislature. Using cross-national data on electoral authoritarian regimes, we find strong empirical evidence supporting our theory. We also explicitly illustrate the causal links between natural resources and electoral systems with additional statistical analyses and comparative case studies on Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan.
In: British journal of political science, Band 37, Heft 1, S. 115-138
ISSN: 0007-1234
In: Comparative political studies: CPS, Band 39, Heft 9, S. 1059-1083
ISSN: 0010-4140
World Affairs Online
In: European journal of political research: official journal of the European Consortium for Political Research, Band 43, Heft 3, S. 449-476
ISSN: 0304-4130
In: World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations, Band 53, Heft 4, S. 588-622
ISSN: 0043-8871
World Affairs Online
In: World development: the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development, Band 157, S. 1-11
World Affairs Online
In: Electoral Studies, Band 44, S. 85-97
In: Governance: an international journal of policy and administration, Band 30, Heft 1, S. 67-84
ISSN: 1468-0491
This article addresses the puzzle of electoral support for corrupt politicians in emerging democracies by examining citizens' varying attitudes toward political corruption. We make an important theoretical distinction between perceptions of and tolerance for corruption, and argue that these different attitudes vary across individuals depending on whether they are political insiders or outsiders. We test our theory using Afrobarometer survey data from 18 sub‐Saharan African countries and find that individuals included within clientelistic networks simultaneously perceive corruption as ubiquitous and are more tolerant of malfeasance. Meanwhile, those individuals with partisan or ethnic ties to the incumbent are less likely to consider corruption as widespread. Finally, we explore whether variation in attitudes toward corruption influences citizens' voting behavior, and find that insiders are less likely to "vote the rascals out."
In: Electoral studies: an international journal, Band 44, S. 85-97
ISSN: 0261-3794
In: The journal of politics: JOP, Band 68, Heft 2, S. 259-271
ISSN: 0022-3816
In: World politics: a quarterly journal of international relations, Band 62, Heft 2, S. 177-220
ISSN: 1086-3338
Utilizing a unique data set from the Italian Ministry of Justice reporting the transmission to the Chamber of Deputies of more than the thousand requests for the removal of parliamentary immunity from deputies suspected of criminal wrongdoing, the authors analyze the political careers of members of the Chamber during the first eleven postwar legislatures (1948–94). They find that judicial investigation typically did not discourage deputies from standing for reelection in Italy's large multimember electoral districts. They also show that voters did not punish allegedly malfeasant legislators with loss of office until the last (Eleventh) legislature in the sample. To account for the dramatic change in voter behavior that occurred in the early 1990s, the investigation focuses on the roles of the judiciary and the press. The results are consistent with a theory that a vigilant and free press is a necessary condition for political accountability in democratic settings. An independent judiciary alone is ineffective in ensuring electoral accountability if the public is not informed of political malfeasance.